Skip to main content

Full coverage

Utah Valley University hires its first chief safety officer in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk murder

7 sources|Diversity: 54%Center blind spot|

By Extra Extra Editorial

Cross-spectrum analysis, synthesized with AI from 7 sources · Updated

How we analyze coverage

Utah Valley University appointed its first chief safety officer following an incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk on campus. The hiring represents an institutional response to security concerns that emerged from the event. Pat McAfee, a public figure, subsequently commented on his discomfort during a visit to the University of Utah, referencing the Kirk incident as context for his concerns about the campus environment.

Left· 5 sources

Left-leaning outlets emphasize McAfee's personal discomfort and his public statements about feeling unsafe, using his account as a lens to examine campus security culture and the broader implications of hosting controversial speakers. This framing centers on individual experiences of unease and questions about institutional responsibility for visitor safety.

Right· 2 sources

Right-leaning coverage focuses on the administrative action itself—the creation of a new safety officer position—and frames McAfee's comments as a separate commentary on campus dynamics. This approach treats the safety hire as a straightforward institutional development while addressing McAfee's concerns as distinct observations.

Key Differences

  • Left outlets lead with McAfee's personal account and discomfort, while right outlets emphasize the institutional response and policy change
  • Left coverage treats the incident and McAfee's reaction as interconnected campus safety concerns, whereas right coverage presents them as parallel but distinct stories
  • Left framing suggests systemic campus environment issues, while right framing focuses on administrative problem-solving

How this story is being covered

7 reports from 6 outlets54/100 cross-spectrum diversitySkipped by centrist outlets6 high-reliability sources

Extra Extra has grouped 7 reports on this story from 6 news outlets across the political spectrum. By political lean, that breaks down as 5 left-leaning and 2 right-leaning sources.

Its coverage-diversity score of 54 out of 100 means the story is being reported across multiple parts of the spectrum, though the volume leans toward one side. Interestingly, the story is being covered on the left and the right but not by the centrist outlets we track — a sign it may be more polarizing than consensus-driven.

On reliability, 6 of the 6 rated outlets carry a high or mostly-factual reliability rating (A or B). Ratings are drawn from independent assessments and are meant to help you weigh each report, not to tell you which to trust.

Coverage of this story has developed over roughly 17 hours, so the perspectives below capture how the framing shifted as the story matured.

Below, the same story is laid out side by side as left, center, and right outlets reported it. Read across the columns and watch what changes: the headline emphasis, which facts lead, the adjectives, and what each side leaves out. The story itself rarely changes — the framing almost always does.

Outlets covering this story: Cleveland.com, The Oregonian, NJ.com, MassLive, PennLive, Deseret News.


Left(5)

Center(0)

No center-leaning sources covered this story

Right(2)

Get this analysis in your inbox

The Daily Spectrum: one email, three perspectives on the day's biggest stories.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.

New to comparing coverage? Start with our guides to reading the news critically.

Back to Compare