Full coverage
New White House Video Features Katy Perry's Face and Music
By Extra Extra Editorial
Cross-spectrum analysis, synthesized with AI from 2 sources · Updated
A White House video released in recent days incorporated singer Katy Perry's likeness and music without her apparent consent or knowledge. The video appears to have been created for promotional purposes, possibly related to military or defense messaging. Perry subsequently expressed displeasure with the unauthorized use of her image and work. The incident raises questions about intellectual property rights, the use of celebrity likenesses in official communications, and the process by which such content is vetted before distribution.
Left-leaning coverage treats this as a straightforward factual report of an incident involving unauthorized use of a celebrity's creative work and image. The framing emphasizes the unauthorized nature of the usage and Perry's reaction, presenting the story as newsworthy because it involves a notable public figure and raises questions about proper permissions and protocols.
Right-leaning sources frame the story through Perry's objection and emotional response, using language that emphasizes her anger and displeasure. The framing centers on the conflict between Perry and the Trump team, treating her reaction as the primary news element rather than focusing on procedural or legal questions about content usage.
Key Differences
- Left coverage emphasizes the unauthorized use itself as the core issue; right coverage emphasizes Perry's emotional reaction and frames it as conflict between the artist and political figures.
- Right-leaning framing uses more dramatic language around Perry's response ('FUMING'), while left coverage maintains more neutral tone about the incident.
How this story is being covered
Extra Extra has grouped 2 reports on this story from 2 news outlets across the political spectrum. By political lean, that breaks down as 1 left-leaning and 1 right-leaning sources.
Its coverage-diversity score of 63 out of 100 means the story is being reported across multiple parts of the spectrum, though the volume leans toward one side. Interestingly, the story is being covered on the left and the right but not by the centrist outlets we track — a sign it may be more polarizing than consensus-driven.
On reliability, 2 outlets fall into our mixed or lower-reliability tier (C or D). Ratings are drawn from independent assessments and are meant to help you weigh each report, not to tell you which to trust.
The reports clustered here landed within about 2 hours of each other, suggesting a fast-moving, breaking story.
Below, the same story is laid out side by side as left, center, and right outlets reported it. Read across the columns and watch what changes: the headline emphasis, which facts lead, the adjectives, and what each side leaves out. The story itself rarely changes — the framing almost always does.
Outlets covering this story: The Daily Beast, The Blaze.
Left(1)
Center(0)
Right(1)
Get this analysis in your inbox
The Daily Spectrum: one email, three perspectives on the day's biggest stories.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
New to comparing coverage? Start with our guides to reading the news critically.
Back to Compare