Full coverage
Nathan Fielder's Elizabeth Holmes documentary ‘You Can See Everything’ coming to Israel
By Extra Extra Editorial
Cross-spectrum analysis, synthesized with AI from 3 sources · Updated
Nathan Fielder has created a documentary about Elizabeth Holmes, the disgraced Theranos founder convicted of fraud, titled 'You Can See Everything.' The project is set to premiere in Israel, marking an international expansion of the documentary's reach. The film examines Holmes through various lenses, including her public presentation and personal choices, as part of broader scrutiny of her rise and fall.
Left-leaning coverage emphasizes the symbolic and performative dimensions of Holmes's public image, focusing on how her appearance and presentation functioned as tools of deception. This framing treats the documentary as an opportunity to deconstruct the aesthetics of fraud and corporate manipulation.
Center outlets frame the story around questions of credibility and trustworthiness, positioning the documentary within the broader context of evaluating Holmes's character and culpability. This approach treats the film as a vehicle for examining whether audiences can accurately assess her motivations and truthfulness.
Right-leaning coverage reports the documentary's international distribution as a straightforward media event, focusing on the logistics of the Israel premiere and Fielder's involvement as the filmmaker. This framing treats the story primarily as entertainment news rather than as commentary on corporate ethics.
Key Differences
- Left outlets emphasize visual and semiotic analysis of Holmes's self-presentation, while right outlets focus on distribution and production details
- Center coverage frames the story around epistemological questions about trust and judgment, distinct from both the aesthetic focus on the left and the logistical focus on the right
- Coverage varies significantly in analytical depth, from cultural criticism to straightforward event reporting
How this story is being covered
Extra Extra has grouped 3 reports on this story from 3 news outlets across the political spectrum. By political lean, that breaks down as 1 left-leaning, 1 center, and 1 right-leaning sources.
With a coverage-diversity score of 100 out of 100, this is one of the more evenly reported stories in our index right now — left, center, and right outlets are all giving it attention.
On reliability, 3 of the 3 rated outlets carry a high or mostly-factual reliability rating (A or B). Ratings are drawn from independent assessments and are meant to help you weigh each report, not to tell you which to trust.
Coverage of this story has developed over roughly 21 hours, so the perspectives below capture how the framing shifted as the story matured.
Below, the same story is laid out side by side as left, center, and right outlets reported it. Read across the columns and watch what changes: the headline emphasis, which facts lead, the adjectives, and what each side leaves out. The story itself rarely changes — the framing almost always does.
Outlets covering this story: Vanity Fair, The Dispatch, The Jerusalem Post.
Left(1)
Center(1)
Right(1)
Get this analysis in your inbox
The Daily Spectrum: one email, three perspectives on the day's biggest stories.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
New to comparing coverage? Start with our guides to reading the news critically.
Back to Compare