Full coverage
Nathan Fielder unveiled the trailer for 'You Can See Everything.' Here's what to know about the Elizabeth Holmes doc.
By Extra Extra Editorial
Cross-spectrum analysis, synthesized with AI from 2 sources · Updated
Nathan Fielder has released a trailer for a documentary about Elizabeth Holmes and the Theranos fraud scandal. The project, titled 'You Can See Everything,' represents Fielder's entry into documentary filmmaking following his work in comedy and scripted television. Holmes, the disgraced founder of the blood-testing company Theranos, was convicted of fraud and is currently navigating the legal system regarding her sentencing and potential incarceration.
Business Insider frames the documentary announcement as a cultural moment worth examining, focusing on Fielder's creative approach to telling the Holmes story and what audiences can expect from the project. The coverage emphasizes the documentary itself as a newsworthy entertainment development rather than primarily as a vehicle for rehashing Holmes' crimes.
The New York Post leads with Holmes' current legal status and housing arrangements, treating the story as an update on her ongoing consequences rather than as a media or entertainment event. This framing prioritizes the practical reality of Holmes' situation over the cultural significance of documentary coverage.
Key Differences
- Left coverage emphasizes the documentary as a creative/entertainment story, while right coverage treats Holmes primarily as a criminal justice update
- Business Insider focuses on what the project reveals about Fielder's filmmaking, whereas NY Post focuses on Holmes' current legal predicament
- The coverage reflects different news values: cultural commentary versus accountability/consequences reporting
How this story is being covered
Extra Extra has grouped 2 reports on this story from 2 news outlets across the political spectrum. By political lean, that breaks down as 1 left-leaning and 1 right-leaning sources.
Its coverage-diversity score of 63 out of 100 means the story is being reported across multiple parts of the spectrum, though the volume leans toward one side. Interestingly, the story is being covered on the left and the right but not by the centrist outlets we track — a sign it may be more polarizing than consensus-driven.
On reliability, 1 of the 2 rated outlets carry a high or mostly-factual reliability rating (A or B) and 1 outlet fall into our mixed or lower-reliability tier (C or D). Ratings are drawn from independent assessments and are meant to help you weigh each report, not to tell you which to trust.
Coverage of this story has developed over roughly 7 hours, so the perspectives below capture how the framing shifted as the story matured.
Below, the same story is laid out side by side as left, center, and right outlets reported it. Read across the columns and watch what changes: the headline emphasis, which facts lead, the adjectives, and what each side leaves out. The story itself rarely changes — the framing almost always does.
Outlets covering this story: Business Insider, NY Post.
Left(1)
Center(0)
Right(1)
Get this analysis in your inbox
The Daily Spectrum: one email, three perspectives on the day's biggest stories.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
New to comparing coverage? Start with our guides to reading the news critically.
Back to Compare