Skip to main content

Full coverage

Jason Arday, Barack Obama, and the Making of Myths

2 sources|Diversity: 63%Center blind spot|

By Extra Extra Editorial

Cross-spectrum analysis, synthesized with AI from 2 sources · Updated

How we analyze coverage

Political cartoonists offered their visual commentary on major events from the week, distilling complex political developments into satirical imagery. The coverage reflects how different media outlets curate and interpret these cartoons to align with their editorial perspectives. Left-leaning sources highlighted cartoons that critiqued conservative political figures and policies, while right-leaning outlets selected cartoons that targeted progressive organizations and their leadership. The cartoons themselves serve as a cultural barometer of how artists across the political spectrum perceive ongoing political tensions and institutional dynamics.

Left· 2 sources

Left-leaning outlets emphasized cartoons that questioned institutional competence and highlighted perceived failures within conservative leadership structures. These sources framed the cartoons as reflecting broader public skepticism toward right-wing political movements and their organizational coherence. The selection process prioritized visual commentary that reinforced critiques of conservative governance and policy direction.

Right· 2 sources

Right-leaning sources selected cartoons that portrayed progressive organizations as internally problematic and their leadership as concerning or untrustworthy. These outlets used the cartoon format to amplify warnings about left-wing institutional influence and decision-making. The framing emphasized cartoons that questioned the competence and intentions of progressive political actors.

Key Differences

  • Left outlets curated cartoons targeting conservative political figures and institutional failures, while right outlets selected cartoons critiquing progressive organizations and their leadership
  • The subject matter diverged significantly—left sources focused on governance and policy critique, right sources focused on organizational integrity and ideological concerns
  • Both sides used the same medium (political cartoons) to reinforce opposing political narratives rather than to provide shared cultural commentary

How this story is being covered

2 reports from 2 outlets63/100 cross-spectrum diversitySkipped by centrist outlets

Extra Extra has grouped 2 reports on this story from 2 news outlets across the political spectrum. By political lean, that breaks down as 1 left-leaning and 1 right-leaning sources.

Its coverage-diversity score of 63 out of 100 means the story is being reported across multiple parts of the spectrum, though the volume leans toward one side. Interestingly, the story is being covered on the left and the right but not by the centrist outlets we track — a sign it may be more polarizing than consensus-driven.

On reliability, 2 outlets fall into our mixed or lower-reliability tier (C or D). Ratings are drawn from independent assessments and are meant to help you weigh each report, not to tell you which to trust.

Coverage of this story has developed over roughly 16 hours, so the perspectives below capture how the framing shifted as the story matured.

Below, the same story is laid out side by side as left, center, and right outlets reported it. Read across the columns and watch what changes: the headline emphasis, which facts lead, the adjectives, and what each side leaves out. The story itself rarely changes — the framing almost always does.

Outlets covering this story: TheGrio, American Greatness.


Left(1)

Center(0)

No center-leaning sources covered this story

Right(1)

Get this analysis in your inbox

The Daily Spectrum: one email, three perspectives on the day's biggest stories.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.

New to comparing coverage? Start with our guides to reading the news critically.

Back to Compare