Skip to main content

Full coverage

Earl Spencer doubles down on claims about ‘monstrous’ call with Charles after Diana’s death

9 sources|Diversity: 97%|

By Extra Extra Editorial

Cross-spectrum analysis, synthesized with AI from 9 sources · Updated

How we analyze coverage

Earl Spencer, Princess Diana's brother, has published a book containing allegations about a phone call with King Charles immediately following Diana's death in 1997. Spencer claims Charles spoke in an unusually animated manner during the conversation, describing his tone as 'giddy' and 'elated,' and characterizes the overall interaction as 'monstrous.' The King's representatives have responded by stating Charles feels deeply wounded and angry over these allegations, while Spencer has defended his account in recent media appearances as truthful.

Left· 2 sources

Left-leaning outlets present Spencer's allegations as a serious challenge to the King's character and emotional fitness, emphasizing the gravity of his claims and the palace's defensive reaction. These sources frame the story as one of institutional accountability, treating Spencer's account as a credible insider perspective that warrants serious examination.

Center· 4 sources

Center and independent sources adopt a more neutral, documentary approach by allowing Spencer to articulate his claims directly while noting the palace's response without taking sides. These outlets focus on Spencer's defense of his truthfulness and the factual details of the alleged conversation rather than editorializing about its implications.

Right· 3 sources

Right-leaning sources amplify Spencer's specific characterizations of Charles's demeanor, using vivid language like 'giddy' and 'elated' to underscore the alleged inappropriateness of his behavior. These outlets also broaden the narrative to include other criticisms Spencer raises about the royal family's handling of grief and care for younger family members.

Key Differences

  • Left outlets emphasize the palace's emotional wound and anger as evidence of the allegations' seriousness, while center sources present both claims and response more symmetrically.
  • Right-leaning coverage expands the story beyond the phone call itself to include Spencer's broader critiques of royal family dysfunction, whereas center outlets remain tighter to the core dispute.
  • Left sources treat Spencer's account as a credibility test for the monarchy, while right outlets use his claims to illustrate systemic problems within the institution.

How this story is being covered

9 reports from 8 outlets97/100 cross-spectrum diversity5 high-reliability sources

Extra Extra has grouped 9 reports on this story from 8 news outlets across the political spectrum. By political lean, that breaks down as 2 left-leaning, 4 center, and 3 right-leaning sources.

With a coverage-diversity score of 97 out of 100, this is one of the more evenly reported stories in our index right now — left, center, and right outlets are all giving it attention.

On reliability, 5 of the 8 rated outlets carry a high or mostly-factual reliability rating (A or B) and 3 outlets fall into our mixed or lower-reliability tier (C or D). Ratings are drawn from independent assessments and are meant to help you weigh each report, not to tell you which to trust.

The reports clustered here landed within about 3 hours of each other, suggesting a fast-moving, breaking story.

Below, the same story is laid out side by side as left, center, and right outlets reported it. Read across the columns and watch what changes: the headline emphasis, which facts lead, the adjectives, and what each side leaves out. The story itself rarely changes — the framing almost always does.

Outlets covering this story: The Guardian, Vanity Fair, BBC News, ABC News (Australia), South China Morning Post, The Sun (UK), GB News, The Gateway Pundit.


Left(2)

Center(4)

Right(3)

Get this analysis in your inbox

The Daily Spectrum: one email, three perspectives on the day's biggest stories.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.

New to comparing coverage? Start with our guides to reading the news critically.

Back to Compare